DLSS5
DLSS5RejectedLiquidity below floor. Pool liquidity $315.664 — below the $5,000 minimum.
What this means
- This contract broke a hard screening rule, so it never reached the grading engine — no score, no dimensions, no chart exist for it.
- Rejection is per-cycle, not permanent: if the pool later clears every rule, it enters the board and this page becomes its graded view on its own.
- Rejected contracts never appear on the board, in search, or in the ticker.
Brq2iafPupZigrs9GnSDmfVwF9jmCS5RVWWwVSBapumpAlgorithmic data summary · Not investment advice · Digital assets can lose all of their value
DLSS5, trading under the symbol DLSS5, is a cryptocurrency contract on the Solana network that was rejected by the CaliberToken automated screening layer. The contract address is Brq2iafPupZigrs9GnSDmfVwF9jmCS5RVWWwVSBapump. The screening rule that this token failed is: Liquidity below floor. The concrete evidence recorded at the time of rejection was: Pool liquidity $315.664 — below the $5,000 minimum.. CaliberToken screens every new and pre-listing token pool across Solana, Base, Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, and Polygon against a fixed set of automated rules including minimum liquidity thresholds, minimum 24-hour trading volume, minimum transaction count, catastrophic price collapse detection, minimum pool age, wash-trading ratio detection, and profile verification. A token that fails any single one of these rules never reaches the grading engine. Rejection is per-cycle rather than permanent: if the contract at Brq2iafPupZigrs9GnSDmfVwF9jmCS5RVWWwVSBapump later satisfies every screening rule, the CaliberToken engine will grade it in a future five-minute cycle and this page will automatically become its graded view. Until then, DLSS5 does not appear on the CaliberToken board, in search results on the site, or in the live ticker. This page exists as part of the CaliberToken public rejection log, published as a transparency dataset so any observer can audit why the algorithmic engine turned this contract away. Nothing on this page is investment advice. The rejection is a mechanical outcome of fixed rules, not an accusation of fraud. Digital assets can lose all of their value.